How important is it for a novel to have at least one likeable character? - is it painttattoo on male genital
I had an idea for a book about the centuries, but none of my characters are cool, not really a hero. "Is it necessary?" I've heard people say before it has at least one character you can root - I just wanted some opinions from people on this issue.
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Is It Painttattoo On Male Genital How Important Is It For A Novel To Have At Least One Likeable Character?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I think it is important to be a sign that the readers can identify themselves, and not necessarily similar. I love books where all characters are flat and boring to read. If you do not feel believable characters that I did not enjoy the book.
I suggest that the poster above.
Pleasant is not required. Credibility is more important.
It depends on whether the audience. As a rule, should be the more the public is less sympathetic characters.
I do not agree with the previous two posters - I think he should have at least a sympathetic character. If none of the characters are good, if I read a book, no matter what their credibility. . . I say, "Why me?" And dismissed, "the book. The books are like the kind of friends. If you have someone credible, but not beautiful, you know him or her as a friend?
Depends on how you write. I recommend a very nice, but no reason. If you are good enough, then you write will be ok, but it will be difficult. If you stay on the safe side, a likable character.
Perhaps after a paragraph with the characters? If so, I change my answer
Post a Comment